Cancer Letters

Cancer Letters

Volume 271, Issue 1, 18 November 2008, Pages 13-24
Cancer Letters

Mini-review
Molecular alterations in prostate cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2008.04.047Get rights and content

Abstract

Prostate tumors display a range of clinical phenotypes, from indolent to aggressively metastatic. Numerous gene expression profiling studies have been conducted toward the potential molecular staging of these pathologies, however the identification of genetic markers that predict aggressive disease has not yet been demonstrated in the clinical setting. A recent survey of the literature has shown that molecular alterations in prostate carcinomas can occur through a variety of different mechanisms, ranging from upstream epigenetic changes and genetic polymorphisms to downstream modulations through alternative splicing and other post-translational processes, some of which could involve noncoding RNAs. A summary of these results and recommendations for future work are the subject of this review.

Introduction

Prostate cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease, both in terms of its pathology and clinical presentation. It is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Western males, yet because prostate tumors can take decades to progress to clinically significant disease, they are difficult to diagnose and treat. Latent prostate cancer is common, with many older men showing localized prostate tumors upon autopsy that died from other causes [1]. In contrast, once metastasis has been detected by imaging, the vast majority of patients will likely die from prostate cancer. Over the past two decades, serum PSA screening has provided a valuable tool for prostate cancer surveillance, however the age-adjusted incidence of mortality has remained relatively constant, therefore new tools are needed to guide prognosis and treatment.

Research into the genetic origins of prostate cancer has accelerated dramatically in recent years, aided by the availability of new high-throughput microarray and sequencing technologies. Numerous gene expression studies have been conducted to characterize prostate cancer initiation and progression, and many of them have shown correlation with clinical outcome. However, molecular associations with prostate cancer phenotypes continue to be fragmentary, and in some cases are poorly substantiated by follow-up investigations [2]. Early studies that profiled cancerous versus benign tissues have now been supplemented by micro-dissection procedures, revealing differences in gene expression patterns across individual tumor foci isolated from the same specimen [3]. Guided by such observations, investigators are now directing their attention to underlying molecular features that could be associated with gene expression alterations, toward a more comprehensive understanding of prostate cancer initiation and progression. These include genetic polymorphisms and epigenetic modifications, alternative splicing, and post-translational regulation involving non-coding RNA. This review surveys studies that have been conducted in each of these areas.

Section snippets

Gene expression profiling in prostate cancer

Shortly following the introduction of gene expression microarray technologies, a number of early profiling studies were reported using prostate cancer tissues and tumor-derived cell lines [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. Such early studies successfully identified genes in key regulatory pathways that are widely associated with cancer phenotypes, for example genes involved in cell cycle regulation, DNA replication, and DNA repair [9]. Singh et al. was the first group to show a correlation between gene

Somatic mutations

Gene expression heterogeneity in prostate cancer is perhaps not very surprising considering the numerous types of chromosomal abnormalities that have been described, including chromosomal insertions, deletions, amplifications, and translocations [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. Genomic instability is an underlying characteristic of prostate carcinoma transformation. Nearly all solid tumors are genetically unstable, and it is now widely accepted that cancer results from the accumulation

Epigenetic modulation

Epigenetic modulations allow transmission of cellular traits without changes in genomic sequence. They appear to be sensitive to a variety of environmental factors that have been associated with prostate cancer progression, such as diet and oxidative stress [53]. The most widely studied epigenetic alterations in cancer include histone modifications and DNA methylation [54]. Their potential application in the diagnosis, disease progression and treatment of prostate cancer has been the subject of

Alternative splicing

Alternative splicing, the process by which exons of pre-mRNAs are spliced in different arrangements, plays a major role in the functional diversity of expressed gene transcripts. This came to be appreciated early this decade when expressed sequence tag (EST) databases such as Unigene predicted on the order of 120,000 human gene bins, whereas early drafts of human genomic sequences predicted only about 25,000–30,000 protein encoding genes. EST sequences can now be aligned to genomic sequences

Other post-transcriptional modulators

Recent estimates indicate that protein encoding genes comprise only about 2% of the human genome, however, tiling microarray experiments have shown that over 50% of the genome is transcribed to RNA [84]. The majority of these transcripts are termed non-coding RNA (ncRNA), the sub-categories of which have been reviewed recently [85]. Non-coding RNAs appear to play important regulatory roles in cellular processes, although many of the mechanisms are not yet understood. For example, Louro et al.

Discussion

As illustrated throughout this review, expression patterns for prostate-cancer-causing genes can be modulated through a variety of different mechanisms (Fig. 2). Furthermore, the original concept of an oncogene has taken on new meaning with the elucidation of somatic mutations and alternative splicing events that result in subtle or even gross differences in protein function. Despite these observations, a number of important oncogenic gene pathways have been elucidated over the past several

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Lyle Arnold for his intellectual contributions and suggestions, and also to Steve Brentano, Matthias Jost, and Harry Rittenhouse for their critical edits and suggestions.

References (108)

  • B.R. Graveley

    Alternative splicing: increasing diversity in the proteomic world

    Trends Genet.

    (2001)
  • B.M. Brinkman

    Splice variants as cancer biomarkers

    Clin. Biochem.

    (2004)
  • M.J. Pajares et al.

    Alternative splicing: an emerging topic in molecular and clinical oncology

    Lancet Oncol.

    (2007)
  • A. David et al.

    Unusual alternative splicing within the human kallikrein genes KLK2 and KLK3 gives rise to novel prostate-specific proteins

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2002)
  • M.E. Stearns et al.

    Expression of a flt-4 (VEGFR3) splicing variant in primary human prostate tumors. VEGF D and flt-4t(Delta773-1081) overexpression is diagnostic for sentinel lymph node metastasis

    Lab. Invest.

    (2004)
  • L.S. Marks et al.

    PCA3 molecular urine assay for prostate cancer in men undergoing repeat biopsy

    Urology

    (2007)
  • R.W. Carthew

    Gene regulation by microRNAs

    Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.

    (2006)
  • R. Garzon et al.

    MicroRNA expression and function in cancer

    Trends Mol. Med.

    (2006)
  • B. Zhang et al.

    MicroRNAs as oncogenes and tumor suppressors

    Dev. Biol.

    (2007)
  • P.D. Maroni et al.

    Screening for prostate cancer in 2006: PSA in the 21st century

    N. C. Med. J.

    (2006)
  • E.P. Gelmann et al.

    Expression of genes and proteins specific for prostate cancer

    J. Urol.

    (2004)
  • C.S. Cooper et al.

    Mechanisms of disease: Biomarkers and molecular targets from microarray gene expression studies in prostate cancer

    Nat. Clin. Pract. Urol.

    (2007)
  • L. Bubendorf et al.

    Hormone therapy failure in human prostate cancer: analysis by complementary DNA and tissue microarrays

    J. Natl. Cancer Inst.

    (1999)
  • J. Xu et al.

    Identification of differentially expressed genes in human prostate cancer using subtraction and microarray

    Cancer Res.

    (2000)
  • D.T. Ross et al.

    Systematic variation in gene expression patterns in human cancer cell lines

    Nat. Genet.

    (2000)
  • U. Scherf et al.

    A gene expression database for the molecular pharmacology of cancer

    Nat. Genet.

    (2000)
  • J. Luo et al.

    Human prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia: molecular dissection by gene expression profiling

    Cancer Res.

    (2001)
  • E. LaTulippe et al.

    Comprehensive gene expression analysis of prostate cancer reveals distinct transcriptional programs associated with metastatic disease

    Cancer Res.

    (2002)
  • M.A. Rubin et al.

    Alpha-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase as a tissue biomarker for prostate cancer

    JAMA

    (2002)
  • C. Magi-Galluzzi et al.

    Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase: a variably sensitive immunohistochemical marker for the diagnosis of small prostate cancer foci on needle biopsy

    Am. J. Surg. Pathol.

    (2003)
  • P.S. Nelson

    Predicting prostate cancer behavior using transcript profiles

    J. Urol.

    (2004)
  • J. Lapointe et al.

    Gene expression profiling identifies clinically relevant subtypes of prostate cancer

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (2004)
  • L. True et al.

    A molecular correlate to the Gleason grading system for prostate carcinoma

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (2006)
  • G. Petrovics et al.

    Frequent overexpression of ETS-related gene-1 (ERG1) in prostate cancer transcriptome

    Oncogene

    (2005)
  • S. Shaheduzzaman, G. Petrovics, V. Srikantan, B. Furusato, I.A. Sesterhenn, D.G. McLeod, S. Srivastava, in: ETS-Related...
  • S. Nanni et al.

    Epithelial-restricted gene profile of primary cultures from human prostate tumors: A molecular approach to predict clinical behavior of prostate cancer

    Mol. Cancer Res.

    (2006)
  • W.B. Isaacs

    Molecular genetics of prostate cancer

    Cancer Surv.

    (1995)
  • P.A. Koivisto

    Molecular cytogenetics of prostate cancer

    Crit. Rev. Oncog.

    (1996)
  • J.T. Dong et al.

    Molecular advances in prostate cancer

    Curr. Opin. Oncol.

    (1997)
  • R.S. Verma et al.

    Chromosomal basis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate

    Cancer Invest.

    (1999)
  • N.N. Nupponen et al.

    Molecular cytogenetics of prostate cancer

    Microsc. Res. Tech.

    (2000)
  • J.T. Dong

    Chromosomal deletions and tumor suppressor genes in prostate cancer

    Cancer Metastasis Rev.

    (2001)
  • C. Lengauer et al.

    Genetic instabilities in human cancers

    Nature

    (1998)
  • G. Narla et al.

    KLF6 a candidate tumor suppressor gene mutated in prostate cancer

    Science

    (2001)
  • D. Pinkel et al.

    Array comparative genomic hybridization and its applications in cancer

    Nat. Genet.

    (2005)
  • P.L. Paris et al.

    Whole genome scanning identifies genotypes associated with recurrence and metastasis in prostate tumors

    Hum. Mol. Genet.

    (2004)
  • W. Liu et al.

    Comprehensive assessment of DNA copy number alterations in human prostate cancers using affymetrix 100 K SNP mapping array

    Genes Chromosomes Cancer

    (2006)
  • S.A. Tomlins et al.

    Recurrent fusion of TMPRSS2 and ETS transcription factor genes in prostate cancer

    Science

    (2005)
  • S. Perner et al.

    TMPRSS2:ERG fusion-associated deletions provide insight into the heterogeneity of prostate cancer

    Cancer Res.

    (2006)
  • S.A. Tomlins et al.

    TMPRSS2:ETV4 gene fusions define a third molecular subtype of prostate cancer

    Cancer Res.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text